Get Instant Access
to This Blueprint

Infrastructure Operations icon

Implement Software Asset Management

Go beyond tracking licenses to proactively managing software throughout its lifecycle.

  • Organizations are aware of the savings that result from implementing software asset management (SAM), but are unsure of where to start the process.
  • Poor data capture procedures and lack of a centralized repository produce an incomplete picture of software assets and licenses, preventing accurate forecasting and license optimization.
  • Audit protocols are ad hoc, resulting in sloppy reporting and time-consuming work and lack of preparedness for external software audits.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • A strong SAM program will benefit all aspects of the business. Data and reports gained through SAM will enable data-driven decision making for all areas of the business.
  • Don’t just track licenses; manage them to create value from data. Gathering and monitoring license data is just the beginning. What you do with that data is the real test.
  • Win the audit battle without fighting. Conduct internal audits to minimize surprises when external audits are requested.

Impact and Result

  • Conduct a current state assessment of existing SAM processes to form an appropriate plan for implementing or improving your SAM program.
  • Define standard policies, processes, and procedures for each stage of the software asset lifecycle, from procurement through to retirement.
  • Develop an internal audit policy to mitigate the risk of costly external audits.


Implement Software Asset Management Research & Tools

Start here – read the Executive Brief

Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should implement software asset management, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

1. Assess & plan

Assess current state and plan the scope of the SAM program, team, and budget.

2. Procure, receive & deploy

Define processes for software requests, procurement, receiving, and deployment.

3. Manage, redeploy & retire

Define processes for software inventory, maintenance, harvest and redeployment, and retirement.


Member Testimonials

After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve. See our top member experiences for this blueprint and what our clients have to say.

9.5/10


Overall Impact

$113,549


Average $ Saved

46


Average Days Saved

Client

Experience

Impact

$ Saved

Days Saved

Washington State Department of Veterans Affairs

Guided Implementation

10/10

N/A

110

Our analyst, Scott Houle was very knowledgeable, helpful, and offered real world experiences to help us in our journey.

City of Tempe

Workshop

10/10

$129K

120

Paul and Candi were great! They kept us on track, yet allowed and encouraged us to talk and collaborate about the issues that were important to our... Read More

Derivco

Workshop

8/10

$64,999

5

Reddy is exceptionally experienced in this field. He got the team talking and interacting and always made sure we were moving at a pace that kept ... Read More

Minnkota Power

Guided Implementation

9/10

$12,999

10

Theo and Sandi provided a wealth of information and knowledge. The guided implementation was extremely helpful keeping us on track with the implem... Read More

Ciena

Guided Implementation

9/10

$519K

110

Tri-State Generation and Transmission Assoc.

Guided Implementation

10/10

$129K

10

Working with Sandi is phenomenal. She has helped us avoid some pitfalls and guidance that will allow us to be much better organized in our pending... Read More

Allegis

Workshop

10/10

N/A

N/A

Overall great experience. Paul is very knowledgeable and I enjoyed his presenting style. Would definitely recommend this workshop to others.

Stratascale

Guided Implementation

10/10

$12,999

20

Sandi is always delightful to work with.

SAIT

Workshop

10/10

$25,000

20

The facilitator, Paul, was able to adapt the workshop to the level of our SAM maturity, which helped the group to better understand our current sta... Read More

County of Clark Nevada

Guided Implementation

9/10

$12,399

5

The University of Texas at San Antonio

Guided Implementation

9/10

$123K

120

eGov Jamaica Ltd.

Guided Implementation

9/10

$61,999

55

Ken Weston and Allison Kinniard were extremely helpful, giving us good insight into the process of establishing good best practices for Asset Manag... Read More

Hanon Systems

Guided Implementation

10/10

$2,337

10

Ken exactly know what I struggling and he suggested me the appropriate way to think.

City of Saskatoon, SK

Workshop

10/10

$47,500

20

Note: these savings are based on how long it will take the City to prepare the standard operating procedure.


Workshop: Implement Software Asset Management

Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

Module 1: Assess & Plan

The Purpose

  • Assess current state and plan the scope of the SAM program, team, and budget.

Key Benefits Achieved

  • Current state assessment
  • Defined roles and responsibilities
  • SAM budget plan

Activities

Outputs

1.1

Outline SAM challenges and objectives.

1.2

Assess current state.

  • Current State Assessment
1.3

Identify roles and responsibilities for SAM team.

  • RACI Chart
1.4

Identify metrics and reports.

  • Defined metrics and reports
1.5

Identify SAM functions to centralize vs. decentralize.

1.6

Plan SAM budget process.

  • SAM Budget Workbook

Module 2: Procure, Receive & Deploy

The Purpose

  • Define processes for software requests, procurement, receiving, and deployment.

Key Benefits Achieved

  • Defined standards for software procurement
  • Documented processes for software receiving and deployment

Activities

Outputs

2.1

Determine software standards.

  • Software standards
2.2

Define procurement process for new contracts.

  • Standard Operating Procedures
2.3

Define process for contract renewals and additional procurement scenarios.

2.4

Design process for receiving software.

  • SAM Process Workflows
2.5

Design deployment workflow.

2.6

Define process for non-standard software requests.

Module 3: Manage, Redeploy & Retire

The Purpose

  • Define processes for software inventory, maintenance, harvest and redeployment, and retirement.

Key Benefits Achieved

  • Defined process for conducting software inventory
  • Maintenance and patch policy
  • Documented workflows for software harvest and redeployment as well as retirement

Activities

Outputs

3.1

Define process for conducting software inventory.

  • Standard Operating Procedures
3.2

Define policies for software maintenance and patches.

  • Patch management policy
3.3

Map software license harvest and reallocation process.

  • SAM Process Workflows
3.4

Define policy for retiring software.

Module 4: Build Supporting Processes & Tools

The Purpose

  • Build processes for audits, identify tool requirements, and plan the implementation.

Key Benefits Achieved

  • Defined process for internal and external audits
  • Tool requirements
  • Communication and implementation plan

Activities

Outputs

4.1

Define and document the internal audit process.

4.2

Define and document the external audit process.

  • Audit response templates
4.3

Document tool requirements.

  • Tool requirements
4.4

Develop a communication plan.

  • Communication plan
4.5

Prepare an FAQ list.

  • End-user FAQ list
4.6

Identify SAM policies.

  • Software Asset Management Policy
4.7

Develop a SAM roadmap to plan your implementation.

  • Implementation roadmap

Implement Software Asset Management

Go beyond tracking licenses to proactively managing software throughout its lifecycle.

Table of contents

  1. Title
  2. Executive Brief
  3. Execute the Project/DIY Guide
  4. Next Steps
  5. Appendix

Analyst Perspective

“Organizations often conflate software asset management (SAM) with license tracking. SAM is not merely knowing how many licenses you require to be in compliance; it’s asking the deeper budgetary questions to right-size your software spend.

Software audits are a growing concern for businesses, but proactive reporting and decision making supported by quality data will mitigate audit risks. Value is left on the table through underused or poor-quality data, so active data management must be in play. A dedicated ITAM tool can assist with extracting value from your license data.

Achieving an optimized SAM program is a transformative effort, but the people, processes, and technology need to be in place before that can happen.” (Sandi Conrad, Senior Director, Infrastructure & Operations Practice, Info-Tech Research Group)

Software license complexity and audit frequency are increasing: are you prepared to manage the risk?

This Research Is Designed For:

  • CIOs that want to improve IT’s reputation with the business.
  • CIOs that want to eliminate the threat of a software audit.
  • Organizations that want proactive reporting that benefits the entire business.
  • IT managers who want visibility into their software usage.

This Research Will Help You:

  • Establish a standardized software management process.
  • Track and manage software throughout its lifecycle, from procurement through to retirement or redeployment.
  • Rationalize your software license estate.
  • Improve your negotiations with software vendors.
  • Improve the quality of your SAM data gathering and reporting.

Executive summary

Situation

  • Organizations are aware of the savings that result from implementing software asset management (SAM), but are unsure of where to start the process. With no formal standards in place for managing licenses, organizations are constantly at risk for costly software audits and poorly executed software spends.

Complication

  • Poor data-capture procedures produce an incomplete picture of software lifecycles.
  • No centralized repository exists, resulting in fragmented reporting.
  • Audit protocols are ad hoc, resulting in sloppy reporting and time-consuming work.

Resolution

  • Conduct a current state assessment of existing SAM processes to form an appropriate plan for implementing or improving your SAM program.
  • Build and involve a SAM team in the process from the beginning to help embed the change.
  • Define standard policies, processes, and procedures for each stage of the software asset lifecycle, from procurement through to retirement. Pace yourself; a staged implementation will make your ITAM program a success.
  • Develop an internal audit program to mitigate the risk of costly audits.
  • Once a standardized SAM program and data are in place, you will be able to use the data to optimize and rationalize your software licenses.

Info-Tech Insight

A strong SAM program will benefit all aspects of the business.
Data and reports gained through SAM will enable data-driven decision making for all areas of the business.

Don’t just track licenses; manage them to create value from data.
Gathering and monitoring license data is just the beginning. What you do with that data is the real test.

Win the audit battle without fighting.
Conduct internal audits to minimize surprises when external audits are requested.

Build the business case for SAM on cost and risk avoidance

You can estimate the return even without tools or data.

Benefit Calculate the return
Compliance

How many audits did you have in the past three years?

How much time did you spend in audit response?

Suppose you had two audits each year for the last three years, each with an average $250,000 in settlements.

A team of four with an average salary of $75,000 each took six months to respond each year, allocating 20% of their work time to the audit.

You could argue annual audits cost on average $530,000. Increasing ITAM maturity stands to reduce that cost significantly.

Efficiency

How much do you spend on software and maintenance by supplier?

Suppose you spent $1M on software last year. What if you could reduce the spend by just 10% through better practices?

SAM can help reduce the annual spend by simplifying support, renegotiating contracts based on asset data, reducing redundancy, and reducing spend.

The Business Benefits of SAM

  • Compliance: Managing audits and meeting legal, contractual, and regulatory obligations.
  • Efficiency: Reducing costs and making the best use of assets while maintaining service.
  • Agility: Anticipate requirements using asset data for business intelligence and analytics.

Poor software asset management practices increase costs and risks

Failure to implement SAM can lead to:

High cost of undiscovered IT assets
  • Needless procurement of software for new hires can be costly.
Licensing, liability, and legal violations
  • Legal actions and penalties that result from ineffective SAM processes and license incompliance can severely impact an organization’s financial performance and corporate brand image.
Compromised security
  • Not knowing what assets you have, who is using them and how, can compromise the security of sensitive information.
Increased management costs
  • Not having up-to-date software license information impacts decision making, with many management teams failing to respond quickly and efficiently to operational demands.
Increased disruptions
  • Vendors seek out organizations who don’t manage their software assets effectively; it is likely that you could be subject to major operational disruptions as a result of an audit.
Poor supplier/vendor relationship
  • Most organizations fear communicating with vendors and are anxious about negotiating new licenses.

54% — A study by 1E found that only 54% of organizations believe they can identify all unused software in their organization.

28% — On average, 28% of deployed software is unused, with a wasted cost of $224 per PC on unused software (1E, 2014).

53% — Express Metrix found that 53% of organizations had been audited within the past two years. Of those, 72% had been audited within the last 12 months.

SAM delivers cost savings beyond the procurement stage

SAM delivers cost savings in several ways:

  • Improved negotiating position
    • Certainty around software needs and licensing terms can put the organization in a better negotiating position for new contracts or contract renewals.
  • Improved purchasing position
    • Centralized procurement can allow for improved purchasing agreements with better pricing.
  • More accurate forecasting and spend
    • With accurate data on what software is installed vs. used, more accurate decisions can be made around software purchasing needs and budgeting.
  • Prevention of over deployment
    • Deploy software only where it is needed based on what end users actively use.
  • Software rationalization
    • SAM data may reveal multiple applications performing similar functions that can be rationalized into a single standard software that is used across the enterprise.
  • License harvesting
    • Identify unused licenses that can be harvested and redeployed to other users rather than purchasing new licenses.

SAM delivers many benefits beyond cost savings

Manage risk. If licensing terms are not properly observed, the organization is at risk of legal and financial exposure, including illegal software installation, loss of proof of licenses purchased, or breached terms and conditions.

Control and predict spend. Unexpected problems related to software assets and licenses can significantly impact cash flow.

Less operational interruptions. Poor software asset management processes could lead to failed deployments, software update interruptions, viruses, or a shutdown of unlicensed applications.

Avoid security breaches. If data is not secure through software patches and security, confidential information may be disclosed.

More informed decisions. More accurate data on software assets improves transparency and informs decision making.

Improved contract management. Automated tools can alert you to when contracts are up for renewal to allow time to plan and negotiate, then purchase the right amount of licenses.

Avoid penalties. Conduct internal audits and track compliance to avoid fees or penalties if an external audit occurs.

Reduced IT support. Employees should require less support from the service desk with proper, up to date, licensed software, freeing up time for IT Operations to focus on other work.

Enhanced productivity. By rationalizing and standardizing software offerings, more staff should be using the same software with the same versioning, allowing for better communication and collaboration.

Asset management is especially correlated with the following processes

Being highly effective at asset management means that you are more likely to be highly effective at almost all IT processes, especially:

Icon for process 'BAI10 Configuration Management'. Configuration Management
76% more effective
Icon for process 'ITRG03 Manage Service Catalogs'. Service Catalog
74% more effective
Icon for process 'APO11 Quality Management'. Quality Management
63% more effective
Icon for process 'ITRG08 Data Quality'. Data Quality
62% more effective
Icon for process 'MEA01 Performance Measurement'. Performance Measurement
61% more effective
Icon for process 'BAI05 Organizational Change Management'. Organizational Change Management
60% more effective
Icon for process 'APO05 Portfolio Management'. Portfolio Management
59% more effective
Icon for process 'APO03 Enterprise Architecture'. Enterprise Architecture
58% more effective

Why? Good SAM processes are integral to both service management and configuration management

(Source: Info-Tech Research Group, IT Management and Governance Diagnostic; N=972 organizations) (High asset management effectiveness was defined as those organizations with an effectiveness score of 8 or above.)

To accelerate progress, Info-Tech Research Group parses software asset management into its essential processes

Focus on software asset management essentials

Software Procurement:

  • Define procurement standards for software and related warranties and support options.
  • Develop processes and workflows for purchasing and work out financial implications to inform budgeting later.

Software Deployment and Maintenance:

  • Define policies, processes, and workflows for software receiving, deployment, and maintenance practices.
  • Develop processes and workflows for managing imaging, harvests and redeployments, service requests, and large-scale rollouts.

Software Harvest and Retirement:

  • Manage the employee termination and software harvest cycle.
  • Develop processes, policies, and workflows for software security and retirement.

Software Contract and Audit Management:

  • Develop processes for data collection and validation to prepare for an audit.
  • Define metrics and reporting processes to keep asset management processes on track.
A diagram that looks like a tier circle with 'Implement SAM' at the center. The second ring has 'Request & Procure', 'Receive & Deploy', 'Manage & Maintain', and 'Harvest & Retire'. The third ring seems to be a cycle beginning with 'Plan', 'Request', 'Procure', 'Deploy', 'Manage', 'Retire', and back to 'Plan'.

Asset management is a key piece of Info-Tech’s COBIT-based IT Management and Governance Framework

The Info-Tech / COBIT5 IT Management & Governance Framework, a number of IT process icons arranged like a periodic table. A magnifying glass highlights process 'BAI09 Asset Management' in the 'Infrastructure & Operations' category.

Follow Info-Tech's methodology to build a plan to implement software asset management

Phase 1
Assess & Plan
Phase 2
Procure, Receive & Deploy
Phase 3
Manage, Redeploy & Retire
Phase 4
Build supporting processes

1.1

Assess current state

2.1

Request & procure

3.1

Manage & maintain contracts

4.1

Compliance & audits

1.2

Build team and define metrics

2.2

Receive & deploy

3.2

Harvest or retire

4.2

Communicate & build roadmap

1.3

Plan & budget
Deliverables
Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)
SAM maturity assessment Process workflows Process workflows Audit response templates
RACI chart Software standards Patch management policy Communication plan & FAQ template
SAM metrics SAM policies
SAM budget workbook

Thanks to SAM, Visa saved $200 million in three years

Logo for VISA.

Case Study

Industry: Financial Services
Source: International Business Software Managers Association

Visa, Inc.

Visa, Inc. is the largest payment processing company in the world, with a network that can handle over 40,000 transactions every minute.

Software Asset Management Program

In 2006, Visa launched a formal IT asset management program, but it was not until 2011 that it initiated a focus on SAM. Joe Birdsong, the SAM director, first addressed four major enterprise license agreements (ELAs) and compliance issues. The SAM team implemented a few dedicated SAM tools in conjunction with an aggressive approach to training.

Results

The proactive approach taken by Visa used a three-pronged strategy: people, process, and tools. The process included ELA negotiations, audit responses, and software license rationalization exercises.

According to Birdsong, “In the past three years, SAM has been credited with saving Visa over $200 million.”

An timeline arrow with benchmarks, in order: 'Tool purchases', 'ELA negotiations', 'License rationalization', 'Audit responses', '$200 million in savings in just three years thanks to optimized SAM processes'.

Info-Tech delivers: Use our tools and templates to accelerate your project to completion

Thumbnail of Info-Tech's 'SAM Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)'.
SAM Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)
Thumbnail of Info-Tech's 'SAM Maturity Assessment'.
SAM Maturity Assessment
Thumbnail of Info-Tech's 'SAM Visio Process Workflows'.
SAM Visio Process Workflows
Thumbnail of Info-Tech's 'SAM Budget Workbook'.
SAM Budget Workbook
Thumbnail of Info-Tech's 'Additional SAM Policy Templates'.
Additional SAM Policy Templates
Thumbnail of Info-Tech's 'Software Asset Management Policy'.
Software Asset Management Policy
Thumbnail of Info-Tech's 'SAM Communication Plan'.
SAM Communication Plan
Thumbnail of Info-Tech's 'SAM FAQ Template'.
SAM FAQ Template

Use these insights to help guide your understanding of the project

  • SAM provides value to other processes in IT.
    Data, reports, and savings gained through SAM will enable data-driven decision making for all areas of the business.
  • Don’t just track licenses; manage them to create value from data.
    Gathering and monitoring license data is just the beginning. What you do with that data is the real test.
  • SAM isn’t about managing costs; it’s about understanding your environment to make better decisions.
    Capital tied up in software can impact the progress of other projects.
  • Managing licenses can impact the entire organization.
    Gain project buy-in from stakeholders by articulating the impact that managing licenses can have on other projects and the prevalence of shadow IT.

Measure the value of a guided implementation (GI)

Engaging in GIs doesn’t just offer valuable project advice, it also results in significant cost savings.

GI Measured Value (Assuming 260 workdays in a year)
Phase 1: Assess & Plan
  • Time, value, and resources saved by using Info-Tech’s methodology to assess current state and create a defined SAM team with actionable metrics
  • For example, 2 FTEs * 5 days * $80,000/year = $6,400
Phase 2: Procure, Receive & Deploy
  • Time, value, and resources saved by using Info-Tech’s methodology to streamline request, procurement, receiving, and deployment processes for software assets.
  • For example, 2 FTEs * 5 days * $80,000/year = $6,400
Phase 3: Manage, Redeploy & Retire
  • Time, value, and resources saved by using Info-Tech’s methodology to streamline the maintenance, inventory, license redeployment, and software retiring processes.
  • For example, 2 FTEs * 5 days * $80,000/year = $6,400
Phase 4: Build Supporting Processes and Tools
  • Time, resources, and potential audit fines saved by using Info-Tech’s methodology to improve audit defense processes ($298,325 average audit penalty (Based on the results of Cherwell Software’s 2013 Software Audit Industry Report)) and design a communication and implementation plan.
  • For example, 2 FTEs * 5days * $80,000/year = $6,400 + $298,325 = $304,725
Total savings $330,325

Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

DIY Toolkit

Guided Implementation

Workshop

Consulting

"Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

Implement Software Asset Management – project overview

Phase 1: Assess & plan Phase 2: Procure, receive & deploy Phase 3: Manage, redeploy & retire Phase 4: Build supporting processes
Supporting Tool icon Best-Practice Toolkit

Step 1.1: Assess current state

Step 1.2: Build team and define metrics

Step 1.3: Plan and budget

Step 2.1: Request and procure

Step 2.2: Receive and deploy

Step 3.1: Manage and maintain contracts

Step 3.2: Harvest, redeploy, or retire

Step 4.1: Compliance and audits

Step 4.2: Communicate and build roadmap

Guided Implementations
  • Assess current state and challenges.
  • Define roles and responsibilities as well as metrics.
  • Discuss SAM budgeting.
  • Define software standards and procurement process.
  • Build processes for receiving software and deploying software.
  • Define process for conducting software inventory and maintenance and patches.
  • Build software harvest and redeployment processes and retirement.
  • Define process for internal and external audits.
  • Develop communication and implementation plan.
Associated Activity icon Onsite Workshop Module 1:
Assess & Plan
Module 2:
Map Core Processes: Procure, Receive & Deploy
Module 3:
Map Core Processes: Manage, Redeploy & Retire
Module 4:
Prepare for audit, build roadmap and communications

Workshop Overview

Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

Workshop Day 1 Workshop Day 2 Workshop Day 3 Workshop Day 4
Activities
Assess & Plan

1.1 Outline SAM challenges and objectives

1.2 Assess current state

1.3 Identify roles and responsibilities for SAM team

1.4 Identify metrics and reports

1.5 Identify SAM functions to centralize vs. decentralize

1.6 Plan SAM budget process

Map Core Processes: Procure, Receive & Deploy

2.1 Determine software standards

2.2 Define procurement process for new contracts

2.3 Define process for contract renewals and additional procurement scenarios

2.4 Design process for receiving software

2.5 Design deployment workflow

2.6 Define process for non-standard software requests

Map Core Processes: Manage, Redeploy & Retire

3.1 Define process for conducting software inventory

3.2 Define policies for software maintenance and patches

3.3 Map software license harvest and reallocation process

3.4 Define policy for retiring software

Build Supporting Processes

4.1 Define and document the internal audit process

4.2 Define and document the external audit process

4.3 Develop a communication plan

4.4 Prepare an FAQ list

4.5 Identify SAM policies

4.6 Develop a SAM roadmap to plan your implementation

Deliverables
  • SAM maturity assessment
  • RACI chart
  • Defined metrics and reports
  • Budget workbook
  • Process workflows
  • Software standards
  • Process workflows
  • Patch management policy
  • Standard operating procedures
  • Audit response templates
  • Communication plan
  • FAQ template
  • Additional policy templates
  • Roadmap of initiatives

About Info-Tech

Info-Tech Research Group is the world’s fastest-growing information technology research and advisory company, proudly serving over 30,000 IT professionals.

We produce unbiased and highly relevant research to help CIOs and IT leaders make strategic, timely, and well-informed decisions. We partner closely with IT teams to provide everything they need, from actionable tools to analyst guidance, ensuring they deliver measurable results for their organizations.

MEMBER RATING

9.5/10
Overall Impact

$113,549
Average $ Saved

46
Average Days Saved

After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.

Read what our members are saying

What Is a Blueprint?

A blueprint is designed to be a roadmap, containing a methodology and the tools and templates you need to solve your IT problems.

Each blueprint can be accompanied by a Guided Implementation that provides you access to our world-class analysts to help you get through the project.

Need Extra Help?
Speak With An Analyst

Get the help you need in this 4-phase advisory process. You'll receive 9 touchpoints with our researchers, all included in your membership.

Guided Implementation 1: Assess & plan
  • Call 1: Assess current state and challenges.
  • Call 2: Define roles and responsibilities as well as metrics.
  • Call 3: Discuss SAM budgeting.

Guided Implementation 2: Procure, receive & deploy
  • Call 1: Define software standards and procurement process.
  • Call 2: Build processes for receiving software and deploying software.

Guided Implementation 3: Manage, redeploy & retire
  • Call 1: Define process for conducting software inventory and maintenance and patches.
  • Call 2: Build software harvest and redeployment processes and retirement.

Guided Implementation 4: Build supporting processes
  • Call 1: Define process for internal and external audits.
  • Call 2: Develop communication and implementation plan.

Authors

Sandi Conrad

Natalie Sansone

Jordan Detmers

Contributors

  • Michael Dean, Director, User Support Services, Des Moines University
  • Simon Leuty, Co-Founder, Livingstone Tech
  • Clare Walsh, PR Consultant, Adesso Tech Ltd
  • Alex Monaghan, Director, Presales EMEA, Product Support Solutions
  • Ben Brand, SAM Practice Manager, Insight
  • Michael Swanson, President, ISAM
  • Bruce Aboudara, SVP, Marketing & Business Development, Scalable Software
  • Will Degener, Senior Solutions Consultant, Scalable Software
  • Peter Gregorowics, Associate Director, Network & Client Services, Vancouver Community College
  • Peter Schnitzler, Operations Team Lead, Toyota Canada
  • David Maughan, Head of Service Transition, Mott MacDonald Ltd
  • Brian Bernard, Infrastructure & Operations Manager, Lee County Clerk of Court
  • Leticia Sobrado, IT Data Governance & Compliance Manager, Intercept Pharmaceuticals
Visit our IT Cost Optimization Center
Over 100 analysts waiting to take your call right now: 1-519-432-3550 x2019