Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment

Agile and requirements management are complementary, not competitors

Analyst's Perspective

The temptation when moving to Agile is to deemphasize good requirements practices in favor of perceived speed. If you're not delivering on the needs of the business then you have failed, regardless of how fast you've gone.

Delivery in Agile doesn't mean you stop needing solid business analysis. In fact, it's even more critical, to ensure your products and projects are adding value. With the rise of Agile, the role of the business analyst has been misunderstood.

As a result, we often throw out the analysis with the bathwater, thinking we'll be just fine without analysis, documentation, and deliberate action, as the speed and dexterity of Agile is enough.

Consequently, what we get is wasted time, money, and effort, with solutions that fail to deliver value, or need to be re-worked to get it right.

The best organizations find balance between these two forces, to align, and gain the benefits of both Agile and business analysis, working in tandem to manage requirements that bring solutions that are "just right".

Vincent Mirabelli
Principal Research Director, Applications Delivery and Management
Info-Tech Research Group

EXECUTIVE BRIEF

Executive Summary

Your Challenge

The process of navigating from waterfall to Agile can be incredibly challenging. And even more problematic; how do you operate your requirements management practices once there? Since there traditionally isn't a role for a business analyst; the traditional keeper of requirements. it isn't like switching on a light.

You likely find yourself struggling to deliver high quality solutions and requirements in Agile. This is a challenge for many organizations, regardless of how long they've leveraged Agile.

But you aren't here for assurances. You're here for answers and help.

Common Obstacles

many organizations and teams face is that there are so busy doing Agile that they fail to be Agile.

Agile was supposed to be the saving grace of project delivery but is misguided in taking the short-term view of "going quickly" at the expense of important elements, such as team formation and interaction, stakeholder engagement and communication, the timing and sequencing of analysis work, decision-making, documentation, and dealing with change.

The idea that good requirements just happen because you have user stories is wrong. So, requirements remain superficial, as you "can iterate later"…but sometimes later never comes, or doesn't come fast enough.

Organizations need to be very deliberate when aligning their Agile and requirements management practices. The work is the same. How the work is done is what changes.

Info-Tech's Approach

Infotech's advice? Why choose? Why have to pick between traditional waterfall and Agile delivery? If Agile without analysis is a recipe for disaster, Agile with analysis is the solution. And how can you leverage the Info-Tech approach to align your Agile and requirements management efforts into a powerful combination?

Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment is your guide.

Use the contents and exercises of this blueprint to gain a shared understanding of the two disciplines, to find your balance in your approach, to define your thresholds, and ultimately, to prepare for new ways of working.

Info-Tech Insight

Agile and requirements management are complementary, not competitors.

The temptation when moving to Agile is to deemphasize good requirements practices in favor of perceived speed. If you're not delivering on the needs of the business, then you have failed, regardless of how fast you've gone.

Insight summary

Overarching insight

Agile and requirements management are complementary, not competitors.

The temptation when moving to Agile is to deemphasize good requirements practices in favor of perceived speed. If you're not delivering on the needs of the business, then you have failed, regardless of how fast you've gone

Phase 1 insight

• The purpose of requirements in waterfall is for approval. The purpose in Agile is for knowledge management, as Agile has no memory.
• When it comes to the Agile manifesto, "over" does not mean "instead of".
• In Agile, the what of business analysis does doesn't change. What does change is the how and when that work happens.

Phase 2 insight

• Understand your uncertainties; it's a great way to decide what level of Agile (if any) is needed.
• Finding your "Goldilocks" zone will take time. Be patient.

Phase 3 insight

• Right-size your governance, based on team dynamics and project complexity. A good referee knows when to step in, and when to let the game flow.
• Agile creates a social contract amongst the team, and with their leaders and organization.
• Documentation needs to be valuable. Do what is acceptable and necessary to move work to future steps. Not documenting also comes with a cost, but one you pay in the future. And that bill will come due, with interest (aka, technical debt, operational inefficiencies, etc.).
• A lack of acceptable documentation makes it more difficult to have agility. You're constantly revalidating your current state (processes, practices and structure) and re-arguing decisions already made. This slows you down more than maintaining documentation ever would.

Phase 4 insight

• Making Agile predictable is hard, because people are not predictable; people are prone to chaos.

There have been many challenges with waterfall delivery

It turns out waterfall is not that great at reducing risk and ensuring value delivery after all

• Lack of flexibility
• Difficulty in measuring progress
• Difficulties with scope creep
• Limited stakeholder involvement
• Long feedback loops

48%
Had project deadlines more than double

85%
Exceeded their original budget by at least 20%

25%
At least doubled their original budget

Source: PPM Express.

Agile was meant to address the shortcomings of waterfall

The wait for solutions was too long for our business partners. The idea of investing significant time, money, and resources upfront, building an exhaustive and complete vision of the desired state, and then waiting months or even years to get that solution, became unpalatable for them. And rightfully so. Once we cast a light on the pains, it became difficult to stay with the status quo. Given that organizations evolve at a rapid pace, what was a pain at the beginning of an initiative may not be so even 6 months later.

Agile became the answer.

Since its' first appearance nearly 20 years ago, Agile has become the methodology of choice for a many of organizations. According to the 15th Annual State of Agile report, Agile adoption within software development teams increased from 37% in 2020 to 86% in 2021.

Adopting Agile led to challenges with requirements

Requirements analysis, design maturity, and management are critical for a successful Agile transformation.

"One of the largest sources of failure we have seen on large projects is an immature Agile implementation in the context of poorly defined requirements."
– "Large Scale IT Projects – From Nightmare to Value Creation"

"Requirements maturity is more important to project outcomes than methodology."
– "Business Analysis Benchmark: Full Report"

"Mature Agile practices spend 28% of their time on analysis and design."
– "Quantitative Analysis of Agile Methods Study (2017): Twelve Major Findings"

"There exists a Requirements Premium… organizations using poor practices spent 62% more on similarly sized projects than organizations using the best requirements practices."
– "The Business Case for Agile Business Analysis" - Requirements Engineering Magazine

Strong stakeholder satisfaction with requirements results in higher satisfaction in other areas

N= 324 small organizations from Info-Tech Research Group's CIO Business Vision diagnostic.

Note: High satisfaction was classified as organizations with a score greater or equal to eight and low satisfaction was every organization that scored below eight on the same questions.

Info-Tech's Agile requirements framework

Agile requirements are a balancing act

Collaboration

Many subject matter experts are necessary to create accurate requirements, but their time is limited too.

Communication

Stakeholders should be kept informed throughout the requirements gathering process, but you need to get the right information to the right people.

Documentation

Recording, organizing, and presenting requirements are essential, but excessive documentation will slow time to delivery.

Control

Establishing control points in your requirements gathering process can help confirm, verify, and approve requirements accurately, but stage gates limit delivery.

What changes for the business analyst?

In Agile, the what of business analysis does not change.

What does change is the how and when that work happens.

Business analysts need to focus on six key elements when managing requirements in Agile.

• Team formation and interaction
• Stakeholder engagement and communication
• The timing and sequencing of their work
• Decision-making
• Documentation
• Dealing with change

Where does the business analysis function fit on an Agile team?

Team formation is key, as Agile is a team sport

A business analyst in an Agile team typically interacts with several different roles, including:

• The product owner,
• The Sponsor or Executive
• The development team,
• Other stakeholders such as customers, end-users, and subject matter experts
• The Design team,
• Security,
• Testing,
• Deployment.

How we do our requirements work will change

• Team formation and interaction
• Stakeholder engagement and communication
• The timing and sequencing of their work
• Decision-making
• Documentation
• Dealing with change

As a result, you'll need to focus on;

• Emphasizing flexibility
• Enabling continuous delivery
• Enhancing collaboration and communication
• Developing a user-centered approach

Get stakeholders on board with Agile requirements

1. Stakeholder feedback and management support are key components of a successful Agile Requirements.
2. Stakeholders can see a project's progression and provide critical feedback about its success at critical milestones.
3. Management helps teams succeed by trusting them to complete projects with business value at top of mind and by removing impediments that are inhibiting their productivity.
4. Agile will bring a new mindset and significant numbers of people, process, and technology changes that stakeholders and management may not be accustomed to. Working through these issues in requirements management enables a smoother rollout.
5. Management will play a key role in ensuring long-term Agile requirements success and ultimately rolling it out to the rest of the organization.
6. The value of leadership involvement has not changed even though responsibilities will. The day-to-day involvement in projects will change but continual feedback will ultimately dictate the success or failure of a project.

Measuring your success

Tracking metrics and measuring your progress

As you implement the actions from this Blueprint, you should see measurable improvements in;

• Team and stakeholder satisfaction
• Requirements quality
• Documentation cost

Without sacrificing time to delivery

Info-Tech's methodology for Agile requirements

Blueprint tools and templates

Key deliverable:

Agile Requirements Playbook

A practical playbook for aligning your teams and articulating the guidelines for managing your requirements in Agile

Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

Documentation Calculator

A tool to help you answer the question: What is the right level of Agile requirements documentation for my organization?

Agile Requirements Assessment

Establishes your current maturity level, defines your target state, and supports planning to get there.

Agile Requirements Workbook

Supporting tools and templates in advancing your Agile requirements practice, to be used with the Agile Requirements Blueprint and Playbook.

Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

DIY Toolkit

"Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

Guided Implementation

"Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

Workshop

"We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

Consulting

"Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

Workshop Overview

Contact your account representative for more information.
workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

Guided Implementation

A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

A typical GI is 10 calls over the course of 4 to 6 months.

Framing Agile and Business Analysis

Phase 1

Framing Agile and Business Analysis

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

• EXERCISE: What do Agile and requirements mean in your organization?
• ASSESSMENT: Agile requirements assessment
• KEY DELIVERABLE: Agile Requirements Playbook

This phase involves the following participants:

• Business analyst and project team
• Stakeholders
• Sponsor/Executive

Managing Requirements in an Agile Environment